Back to EveryPatent.com
United States Patent |
5,349,119
|
Puskaric
|
September 20, 1994
|
Inbred corn line PHTM9
Abstract
According to the invention, there is provided an inbred corn line,
designated PHTM9. This invention thus relates to the plants and seeds of
inbred corn line PHTM9 and to methods for producing a corn plant produced
by crossing the inbred line PHTM9 with itself or with another corn plant.
This invention further relates to hybrid corn seeds and plants produced by
crossing the inbred line PHTM9 with another corn line or plant.
Inventors:
|
Puskaric; Vladimir (Ontario, CA)
|
Assignee:
|
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. (Des Moines, IA)
|
Appl. No.:
|
831235 |
Filed:
|
February 3, 1992 |
Current U.S. Class: |
800/303; 435/412; 800/320.1 |
Intern'l Class: |
A01H 005/00; A01H 004/00; C12N 005/04 |
Field of Search: |
800/200,250,235,205,DIG. 56
47/58,DIG. 1,58.03,58.05
435/240.4,240.45,240.49
|
References Cited
Other References
Meghji et al. (1984) Crop Science vol. 24, pp. 454-549.
Poehlman (1980) Breeding Field Crops AVI Publishing Co. pp. 237-247.
Conger, B. V. et al., "Somatic Embryogenesis From Cultured Leaf Segments of
Zea mays", Plant Cell Reports, 6:345-347 (1987).
Rao, K. V. et al., "Somatic Embryogenesis in Glume Callus Cultures",
Osmania Universiy, Hyderabad, India.
Songstad, D. D. et al., "Effect of ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic
acid), Silver Nitrate & Norbornadiene on Plant Regeneration From Maize
Callus Cultures", Plant Cell Reports, 7:262-265 (1988).
Duncan, D. R. et al., "The Production of Callus Capable of Plant
Regeneration From Immature Embryos of Numerous Zea mays Genotype Planta",
165:322-332 (1985).
|
Primary Examiner: Benzion; Gary
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. Inbred corn seed designated PHTM9, and having ATCC Accession No. 75749.
2. A corn plant produced by the seed of claim 1.
3. A corn plant having all the physiological and morphological
characteristics of the plant of claim 2.
4. The corn plant of claim 2 further comprising a cytoplasmic factor
conferring male sterility.
5. A tissue culture of regenerable cells, of the inbred corn plant PHTM9
wherein the tissue regenerates plants having all the morphological and
physiological characteristics of PHTM9.
6. Tissue culture of a plant according to claim 5, the tissue culture
selected from the group consisting of leaves, pollen, embryos, roots, root
tips, anthers, silk, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, husks, stalks, and
cells, and protoplasts thereof.
7. A corn plant regenerated from the tissue culture generated from inbred
corn plant PHTM9 and having all the physiological and morphological
characteristics of PHTM9.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention is in the field of corn breeding, specifically relating to
an inbred corn line designated PHTM9.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The goal of plant breeding is to combine in a single variety or hybrid
various desirable traits. For field crops, these traits may include
resistance to diseases and insects, tolerance to heat and drought,
reducing the time to crop maturity, greater yield, and better agronomic
quality. With mechanical harvesting of many crops, uniformity of plant
characteristics such as germination and stand establishment, growth rate,
maturity, and plant and fruit height, is important.
Field crops are bred through techniques that take advantage of the plant's
method of pollination. A plant is self-pollinated if pollen from one
flower is transferred to the same or another flower of the same plant. A
plant is cross-pollinated if the pollen comes from a flower on a different
plant.
Plants that have been self-pollinated and selected for type for many
generations become homozygous at almost all gene loci and produce a
uniform population of true breeding progeny. A cross between two
homozygous lines produces a uniform population of hybrid plants that may
be heterozygous for many gene loci. A cross of two plants each
heterozygous at a number of gene loci will produce a population of hybrid
plants that differ genetically and will not be uniform.
Corn plants (Zea mays L.) can be bred by both self-pollination and
cross-pollination techniques. Corn has separate male and female flowers on
the same plant, located on the tassel and the ear, respectively. Natural
pollination occurs in corn when wind blows pollen from the tassels to the
silks that protrude from the tops of the incipient ears.
The development of corn hybrids requires the development of homozygous
inbred lines, the crossing of these lines, and the evaluation of the
crosses. Pedigree breeding and recurrent selection breeding methods are
used to develop inbred lines from breeding populations. Breeding programs
combine the genetic backgrounds from two or more inbred lines or various
other broad-based sources into breeding pools from which new inbred lines
are developed by selling and selection of desired phenotypes. The new
inbreds are crossed with other inbred lines and the hybrids from these
crosses are evaluated to determine which of those have commercial
potential.
Pedigree breeding starts with the crossing of two genotypes, each of which
may have one or more desirable characteristics that is lacking in the
other or which complement the other. If the two original parents do not
provide all of the desired characteristics, other sources can be included
in the breeding population. In the pedigree method, superior plants are
selfed and selected in successive generations. In the succeeding
generations the heterozygous condition gives way to homogeneous lines as a
result of self-pollination and selection. Typically in the pedigree method
of breeding five or more generations of selfing and selection is
practiced: F.sub.1 .fwdarw.F.sub.2 ; F.sub.2 .fwdarw.F.sub.3 ; F.sub.3
.fwdarw.F.sub.4 ; F.sub.4 .fwdarw.F.sub.5, etc.
Backcrossing can be used to improve an inbred line. Backcrossing transfers
a specific desirable trait from one inbred or source to an inbred that
lacks that trait. This can be accomplished for example by first crossing a
superior inbred (A) (recurrent parent) to a donor inbred (non-recurrent
parent), which carries the appropriate gene(s) for the trait in question.
The progeny of this cross is then mated back to the superior recurrent
parent (A) followed by selection in the resultant progeny for the desired
trait to be transferred from the non-recurrent parent. After five or more
backcross generations with selection for the desired trait, the progeny
will be heterozygous for loci controlling the characteristic being
transferred, but will be like the superior parent for most or almost all
other genes. The last backcross generation would be selfed to give pure
breeding progeny for the gene(s) being transferred.
A single cross hybrid corn variety is the cross of two inbred lines, each
of which has a genotype which complements the genotype of the other. The
hybrid progeny of the first generation is designated F.sub.1. In the
development of hybrids only the F.sub.1 hybrid plants are sought.
Preferred F.sub.1 hybrids are more-vigorous than their inbred parents.
This hybrid vigor, or heterosis, can be manifested in many polygenic
traits, including increased vegetative growth and increased yield.
The development of a hybrid corn variety involves three steps: (1) the
selection of plants from various germplasm pools; (2) the selfing of the
selected plants for several generations to produce a series of inbred
lines, which, although different from each other, breed true and are
highly uniform; and (3) crossing the selected inbred lines with unrelated
inbred lines to produce the hybrid progeny (F.sub.1). During the
inbreeding process in corn, the vigor of the lines decreases. Vigor is
restored when two unrelated inbred lines are crossed to produce the hybrid
progeny (F.sub.1). An important consequence of the homozygosity and
homogeneity of the inbred lines is that the hybrid between any two inbreds
will always be the same. Once the inbreds that give a superior hybrid have
been identified, the hybrid seed can be reproduced indefinitely as long as
the homogeneity of the inbred parents is maintained.
A single cross hybrid is produced when two inbred lines are crossed to
produce the F.sub.1 progeny. A double cross hybrid is produced from four
inbred lines crossed in pairs (A x B and C x D) and then the two F.sub.1
hybrids are crossed again (A x B) x (C x D). Much of the hybrid vigor
exhibited by F.sub.1 hybrids is lost in the next generation (F.sub.2).
Consequently, seed from hybrid varieties is not used for planting stock.
Corn is an important and valuable field crop. Thus, a continuing goal of
plant breeders is to develop high-yielding corn hybrids that are
agronomically sound based on stable inbred lines. The reasons for this
goal are obvious: to maximize the amount of grain produced with the inputs
used and minimize susceptibility of the crop to environmental stresses. To
accomplish this goal, the corn breeder must select and develop superior
inbred parental lines for producing hybrids. This requires identification
and selection of genetically unique individuals which in a segregating
population occur as the result of a combination of crossover events plus
the independent assortment of specific combinations of alleles at many
gene loci which results in specific genotypes. Based on the number of
segregating genes, the frequency of occurrence of an individual with a
specific genotype is less than 1 in 10,000. Thus, even if the entire
genotype of the parents has been characterized and the desired genotype is
known, only a few if any individuals having the desired genotype may be
found in a large F.sub.2 or S.sub.0 population. Typically, however, the
genotype of neither the parents nor the desired genotype is known in any
detail.
At Pioneer Hi-Bred International, a typical corn research station has a
staff of four, and 20 acres of breeding nursery. Those researchers plant
those 20 acres with 25,000 nursery rows, 15,000 yield test plots in 10-15
yield test sites, and one or two disease-screening nurseries. Employing a
temporary crew of 20 to 30 pollinators, the station makes about 65,000
hand pollinations per growing season, and produces from three to ten new
inbreds which are proposed for commercial use each year. Over the 32
Pioneer research stations in North America, this amounts to from about 100
to 300 new inbreds proposed each year from over 2,000,000 pollinations. Of
those, less than 50 and more commonly less than 30 are actually selected
for commercial use.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention, there is provided a novel inbred corn line,
designated PHTM9. This invention thus relates to the seeds of inbred corn
line PHTM9, to the plants of inbred corn line PHTM9, and to methods for
producing a corn plant produced by crossing the inbred line PHTM9 with
itself or another corn line. This invention further relates to hybrid corn
seeds and plants produced by crossing the inbred line PHTM9 with another
corn line.
DEFINITIONS
In the description and examples that follow, a number of terms are used
herein. In order to provide a clear and consistent understanding of the
specification and claims, including the scope to be given such terms, the
following definitions are provided. ABS is in absolute terms and % MN is
percent of the mean for the experiments in which the inbred or hybrid was
grown.
BAR PLT=BARREN PLANTS. The percent of plants per plot that were not barren
(lack ears).
BRT STK=BRITTLE STALKS. This is a measure of the stalk breakage near the
time of pollination, and is an indication of whether a hybrid or inbred
would snap or break near the time of flowering under severe winds. Data
are presented as percentage of plants that did not snap.
BU ACR=YIELD (BUSHELS/ACRE). Actual yield of the grain at harvest in
bushels per acre adjusted to 15.5% moisture.
DRP EAR=DROPPED EARS. A measure of the number of dropped ears per plot and
represents the percentage of plants that did not drop ears prior to
harvest.
EAR HT=EAR HEIGHT. The ear height is a measure from the ground to the
highest placed developed ear node attachment and is measured in inches.
EAR SZ=EAR SIZE. A 1 to 9 visual rating of ear size. The higher the rating
the larger the ear size.
EST CNT=EARLY STAND COUNT. This is a measure of the stand establishment in
the spring and represents the number of plants that emerge on a per plot
basis for the inbred or hybrid.
GDU SHD=GDU TO SHED. The number of growing degree units (GDUs) or heat
units required for an inbred line or hybrid to have approximately 50
percent of the plants shedding pollen and is measured from the time of
planting. Growing degree units are calculated by the Barger Method, where
the heat units for a 24-hour period are:
##EQU1##
The highest maximum temperature used is 86.degree. F. and the lowest
minimum temperature used is 50.degree. F. For each inbred or hybrid it
takes a certain number of GDUs to reach various stages of plant
development.
GDU SLK=GDU TO SILK. The number of growing degree units required for an
inbred line or hybrid to have approximately 50 percent of the plants with
silk emergence from time of planting. Growing degree units are calculated
by the Barger Method as given in GDU SHD definition.
GRN APP=GRAIN APPEARANCE. This is a 1 to 9 rating for the general
appearance of the shelled grain as it is harvested based on such factors
as the color of the harvested grain, any mold on the grain, and any
cracked grain. High scores indicate good grain quality.
MST=HARVEST MOISTURE. The moisture is the actual percentage moisture of the
grain at harvest.
PLT HT=PLANT HEIGHT. This is a measure of the height of the plant from the
ground to the tip of the tassel in inches.
POL SC=POLLEN SCORE. A 1 to 9 visual rating indicating the amount of pollen
shed. The higher the score the more pollen shed.
POL WT=POLLEN WEIGHT. This is calculated by dry weight of tassels collected
as shedding commences minus dry weight from similar tassels harvested
after shedding is complete.
It should be understood that the inbred can, through routine manipulation
of cytoplasmic factors, be produced in a cytoplasmic male-sterile form
which is otherwise phenotypically identical to the male-fertile form.
PRM=PREDICTED RM. This trait, predicted relative maturity (RM), is based on
the harvest moisture of the grain. The relative maturity rating is based
on a known set of checks and utilizes standard linear regression analyses
and is referred to as the Comparative Relative Maturity Rating System
which is similar to the Minnesota Relative Maturity Rating System.
RT LDG=ROOT LODGING. Root lodging is the percentage of plants that do not
root lodge; plants that lean from the vertical axis at an approximately
30.degree. angle or greater would be counted as root lodged.
SCT GRN=SCATTER GRAIN. A 1 to 9 visual rating indicating the amount of
scatter grain (lack of pollination or kernel abortion) on the ear. The
higher the score the less scatter grain.
SDG VGR=SEEDLING VIGOR. This is the visual rating (1 to 9) of the amount of
vegetative growth after emergence at the seedling stage (approximately
five leaves). A higher score indicates better vigor.
SEL IND=SELECTION INDEX. The selection index gives a single measure of the
hybrid's worth based on information for up to five traits. A corn breeder
may utilize his or her own set of traits for the selection index. One of
the traits that is almost always included is yield. The selection index
data presented in the tables represent the mean value averaged across
testing stations.
STA GRN=STAY GREEN. Stay green is the measure of plant health near the time
of black layer formation (physiological maturity). A high score indicates
better late-season plant health.
STK CNT=NUMBER OF PLANTS. This is the final stand or number of plants per
plot.
STK LDG=STALK LODGING. This is the percentage of plants that did not stalk
lodge (stalk breakage) as measured by either natural lodging or pushing
the stalks and determining the percentage of plants that break below the
ear.
TAS BLS=TASSEL BLAST. A 1 to 9 visual rating was used to measure the degree
of blasting (necrosis due to heat stress) of the tassel at time of
flowering. A 1 would indicate a very high level of blasting at time of
flowering, while a 9 would have no tassel blasting.
TAS SZ=TASSEL SIZE. A 1 to 9 visual rating was used to indicate the
relative size of the tassel. The higher the rating the larger the tassel.
TAS WT=TASSEL WEIGHT. This is the average weight of a tassel (grams) just
prior to pollen shed.
TEX EAR=EAR TEXTURE. A 1 to 9 visual rating was used to indicate the
relative hardness (smoothness of crown) of mature grain. A 1 would be very
soft (extreme dent) while a 9 would be very hard (flinty or very smooth
crown).
TILLER=TILLERS. A count of the number of tillers per plot that could
possibly shed pollen was taken. Data is given as percentage of tillers:
number of tillers per plot divided by number of plants per plot.
TST WT=TEST WEIGHT (UNADJUSTED). The measure of the weight of the grain in
pounds for a given volume (bushel).
TST WTA=TEST WEIGHT ADJUSTED. The measure of the weight of the grain in
pounds for a given volume (bushel) adjusted for percent moisture.
YLD=YIELD. It is the same as BU ACR ABS.
YLD SC=YIELD SCORE. A 1 to 9 visual rating was used to give a relative
rating for yield based on plot ear piles. The higher the rating the
greater visual yield appearance.
MDM CPX=Maize Dwarf Mosaic Complex (MDMV=Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus &
MCDV=Maize Chlorotic Dwarf Virus): Visual rating (1-9 score) where a "1"
is very susceptible and a "9" is very resistant.
SLF BLT=Southern Leaf Blight (Bipolaris maydis, Helminthosporium maydis):
Visual rating (1-9 score) where a "1" is very susceptible and a "9" is
very resistant.
NLF BLT=Northern Leaf Blight (Exserohilum turcicum, H. turcicum): Visual
rating (1-9 score) where a "1" is very susceptible and a "9" is very
resistant.
COM RST=Common Rust (Puccinia sorghi): Visual rating (1-9 score) where a
"1" is very susceptible and a "9" is very resistant.
GLF SPT=Gray Leaf Spot (Cercospora zeae-maydis): Visual rating (1-9 score)
where a "1" is very susceptible and a "9" is very resistant.
STW WLT=Stewart's Wilt (Erwinia stewartii): Visual rating (1-9 score) where
a "1" is very susceptible and a "9" is very resistant.
HD SMT=Head Smut (Sphacelotheca reiliana): Percentage of plants that did
not have infection.
EAR MLD=General Ear Mold: Visual rating (1-9 score) where a "1" is very
susceptible and a "9" is very resistant. This is based on overall rating
for ear mold of mature ears without determining specific mold organism,
and may not be predictive for a specific ear mold.
ECB DPE=Dropped ears due to European Corn Borer (Ostrinia nubilalis):
Percentage of plants that did not drop ears under second brood corn borer
infestation.
ECB 2SC=European Corn Borer Second Brood (Ostrinia nubilalis): Visual
rating (1-9 score) of post flowering damage due to infestation by European
Corn Borer. A "1" is very susceptible and a "9" is very resistant.
ECB 1LF=European Corn Borer First Brood (Ostrinia nubilalis): Visual rating
(1-9 score) of pre-flowering leaf feeding by European Corn Borer. A "1" is
very susceptible and a "9" is very resistant.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Inbred corn line PHTM9 is a yellow, dent corn inbred that is best suited as
a male in crosses for producing first generation F1 corn hybrids. PHTM9 is
best adapted to the Northeast part of the United States and can be used to
produce hybrids from approximately 83-97 relative maturity based on the
Minnesota Relative Maturity Rating System for harvest moisture of grain.
PHTM9 is a high yielding inbred in its maturity with good drydown and
excellent grain appearance. The inbred has poor stay green and is unique
in that it has a low kernel row number on a white cob.
The inbred has shown uniformity and stability within the limits of
environmental influence for all the traits as described in the Variety
Description Information (Table 1) that follows. Most of the data in the
Variety Description information was collected at Johnston, Iowa. The
inbred has been self-pollinated and ear-rowed a sufficient number of
generations with careful attention paid to uniformity of plant type to
ensure homozygosity and phenotypic stability. The line has been increased
both by hand and in isolated fields with continued observation for
uniformity. No variant traits have been observed or are expected in PHTM9.
Inbred corn line PHTM9, being substantially homozygous, can be reproduced
by planting seeds of the line, growing the resulting corn plants under
self-pollinating or sib-pollinating conditions with adequate isolation,
and harvesting the resulting seed, using techniques familiar to the
agricultural arts.
TABLE 1
______________________________________
VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION
INBRED = PHTM9
______________________________________
Type: Dent
Region Best Adapted: Northeast
A. Maturity: Average across maturity zones. Zone: 0
GDU Shed: 1250
GDU Silk: 1270
No. Reps: 29
B. Plant Characteristics:
Plant height (to tassel tip): 192 cm
Length of top ear internode: 15 cm
Number of ears per stalk: Single
Ear height (to base of top ear): 48 cm
Number of tillers: None
Cytoplasm type: Normal
C. Leaf:
Color: Medium Green (WF9)
Angle from Stalk: 30-60 degrees
Marginal Waves: Few (WF9)
Number of Leaves (mature plants): 14
Sheath Pubescence: Light (W22)
Longitudinal Creases: Few (OH56A)
Length (Ear node leaf): 71 cm
Width (widest point, ear node leaf): 8 cm
D. Tassel:
Number lateral branches: 3
Branch Angle from central spike: 30-40 degrees
Pollen Shed: Heavy (KY21) based on Pollen Yield Test
(116% of experiment means)
Peduncle Length (top leaf to basal branches): 21 cm
Anther Color: Yellow
Glume Color: Green
E. Ear (Husked Ear Data Except When Stated Otherwise):
Length: 14 cm
Weight: 77 gm
Mid-point Diameter: 33 mm
Silk Color: Yellow
Husk Extension (Harvest stage): Medium (Barely Covering
Ear)
Husk Leaf: Long (>15 cm)
Taper of Ear: Slight
Position of Shank (dry husks): Upright
Kernel Rows: Straight, Distinct Number = 12
Husk Color (fresh): Light Green
Husk Color (dry): Buff
Shank Length: 13 cm
Shank (No. of internodes): 8
F. Kernel (Dried):
Size (from ear mid-point)
Length: 10 mm
Width: 8 mm
Thick: 4 mm
Shape Grade (% rounds): (26% medium round based on
Parent Test Data)
Pericarp Color: Colorless
Aleurone Color: Homozygous Yellow
Endosperm Color: Yellow
Endosperm Type: Normal Starch
Gm Wt/100 Seeds (unsized): 23 gm
G. Cob:
Diameter at mid-point: 17 mm
Strength: Weak
Color: White
H. Diseases:
N. Leaf Blight (E. turcicum): Susceptible
Common Rust (P. sorghi): Intermediate
Gray Leaf Spot (C. zeae): Susceptible
Goss's Wilt (C. nebraskense): Intermediate
Fusarium Ear Mold (F. moniliforme): Resistant
I. Insects:
European Corn Borer-1 Leaf Damage (Pre-flowering):
Resistant
European Corn Borer-2 (Post-flowering): Intermediate
The above descriptions are based on a scale of 1-9, 1 being
highly susceptible, 9 being highly resistant.
S (Susceptible): Would generally represent a score of 1-3.
I (Intermediate): Would generally represent a score of 4-5.
R (Resistant): Would generally represent a score of 6-7.
H (Highly Resistant): Would generally represent a score of
8-9. Highly resistant does not
imply the inbred is immune.
J. Variety Most Closely Resembling:
Character Inbred
Maturity PHG47
Usage PHG47
______________________________________
0150
TABLE 2
______________________________________
ELECTROPHORESIS RESULTS FOR PHTM9
AND ITS PARENTS PHG47 AND PHG36
PARENTS
LOCI PHTM9 PHG47 PHG36
______________________________________
ACP1 4 4 4
ADH1 4 4 4
CAT3 9 9 9
DIA1 8 8 8
GOT1 4 4 4
GOT2 4 4 4
GOT3 4 4 4
IDH1 4 4 4
IDH2 6 4 6
MDH1 6 6 6
MDH2 3.5 3 3.5
MDH3 16 16 16
MDH4 12 12 12
MDH5 12 12 12
MMM 4 4 4
PGM1 9 9 9
PGM2 4 4 8
PGD1 3.8 2 3.8
PGD2 5 5 5
PHI1 4 4 4
______________________________________
0200
TABLE 3A
__________________________________________________________________________
PAIRED INBRED COMPARISON DATA
VARIETY #1 = PHTM9
VARIETY #2 = PHG47
__________________________________________________________________________
BU BU YLD EAR BAR PLT EAR SDG
VAR ACR ACR SC MST SZ PLT HT HT VGR
DEPT # ABS % MN
ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 44.1
73 4.6 15.6
4.0 88.4
77.9
22.9
6.7
2 39.9
66 3.7 18.2
3.3 88.6
62.5
17.9
4.5
LOCS
3 3 7 3 6 7 17 16 22
REPS
12 12 7 12 6 15 29 29 27
DIFF
4.2 7 0.9 2.6 0.7 0.3 15.4
5.1 2.2
PROB
.390
.338
.078*
.034+
.175
.953
.000#
.000#
.000#
__________________________________________________________________________
EST TIL GDU GDU POL POL POL TAS TAS
VAR CNT LER SHD SLK WT WT SC BLS SZ
DEPT # ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS % MN
ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 36.5
0.9 1232
1267
143.2
116 5.4 9.0 4.6
2 33.2
2.1 1336
1356
166.8
132 5.6 9.0 5.8
LOCS
48 26 38 37 8 8 14 4 11
REPS
115 42 59 57 16 16 24 8 11
DIFF
3.4 1.2 104 89 23.6
16 0.3 0.0 1.2
PROB
.000#
.113
.000#
.000#
.163
.221
.405
1.00
.019+
__________________________________________________________________________
TEX TST SCT STA STK
VAR EAR WT GRN GRN LDG
DEPT # ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 7.1 60.6
7.7 1.2 99.4
2 6.1 58.0
7.4 4.1 97.0
LOCS
7 3 9 5 2
REPS
7 12 9 11 8
DIFF
1.0 2.6 0.2 2.9 2.5
PROB
.156
.016+
594 .029+
.306
__________________________________________________________________________
RT COM EAR HD NLF
VAR LDG RST MLD SMT BLT
DEPT # ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 97.4
5.5 7.1 100.0
1.0
2 98.8
6.5 6.6 98.6
3.8
LOCS
6 2 10 4 4
REPS
10 2 10 8 4
DIFF
1.4 1.0 0.5 1.4 2.8
PROB
.363
.000#
.213
.391
.089*
__________________________________________________________________________
ECB ECB
VAR 1LF 2SC
DEPT # ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 4.4 4.3
2 3.2 3.8
LOCS
12 3
REPS
12 6
DIFF
1.3 0.5
PROB
.049+
.580
__________________________________________________________________________
* = 10% SIG
+ = 5% SIG
# = 1% SIG 0210
TABLE 3B
__________________________________________________________________________
PAIRED INBRED COMPARISON DATA
VARIETY #1 = PHTM9
VARIETY #2 = PHG36
__________________________________________________________________________
BU BU BAR PLT EAR SDG EST TIL GDU GDU
VAR ACR ACR MST PLT HT HT VGR CNT LER SHD SLK
DEPT # ABS % MN
ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 33.5
65 15.3
75.9
79.0
23.8
6.0 47.7
0.4 1320
1330
2 21.2
41 16.5
55.2
57.0
17.5
6.7 50.8
0.8 1160
1170
LOCS
2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1
REPS
4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 2 2
DIFF
12.2
24 1.2 20.7
22.0
6.3 0.7 3.2 0.4 160 160
PROB
.186
.064*
.220
.594
.142
.344
.184
.185
.748
__________________________________________________________________________
TST STA STK
VAR WT GRN LDG
DEPT # ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 60.3
1.0 99.4
2 51.1
1.0 98.8
LOCS
2 3 2
REPS
4 6 4
DIFF
9.2 0.0 0.6
PROB
.328
1.00
.790
__________________________________________________________________________
RT
VAR LDG
DEPT # ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 92.1
2 87.8
LOCS
2
REPS
4
DIFF
4.3
PROB
.500
__________________________________________________________________________
ECB
VAR 2SC
DEPT # ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 6.0
2 8.5
LOCS
1
REPS
2
DIFF
2.5
PROB
__________________________________________________________________________
* = 10% SIG
+ = 5% SIG
# = 1% SIG 0220
TABLE 4A
__________________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE INBRED BY TESTER PERFORMANCE COMPARING PHTM9 TO PHG47 CROSSED TO
THE SAME INBRED TESTERS AND GROWN IN THE SAME EXPERIMENTS. ALL VALUES
ARE
EXPRESSED AS PERCENT OF THE EXPERIMENT MEAN EXCEPT PREDICTED RM,
SELECTION
INDEX, AND YIELD (BU/ACR).
__________________________________________________________________________
SEL BU GDU PRM STK RT STA
INBRED
PRM IND ACR YLD MST SHD SHD LDG LDG GRN
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL REPLIC.
72 70 70 70 72 29 7 66 2 27
MEAN WTS
PHTM9 88 99 154 98 94 99 92 100 108 69
MEAN WTS
PHG47 92 104 161 103 100 102 95 99 108 121
DIFF. 4 5 7 5 6 3 3 1 53
__________________________________________________________________________
TST GRN SDG EST STK PLT EAR DRP BRT
INBRED
WTA APP VGR CNT CNT HT HT EAR STK
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL REPLIC.
68 58 32 57 75 42 42 43 2
MEAN WTS
PHTM9 100 110 94 99 100 107 101 100 102
MEAN WTS
PHG47 98 108 98 101 101 103 99 100 102
DIFF. 2 2 4 2 1 3 2 0
__________________________________________________________________________
0230
TABLE 5
__________________________________________________________________________
PHTM9 HYBRID COMPARED TO PIONEER HYBRID 3751
VARIETY #1 = PHTM9 HYBRID
VARIETY #2 = 3751
__________________________________________________________________________
BU BU BAR PLT EAR SDG EST DRP
BAR ACR ACR MST PLT HT HT VGR CNT EAR
DEPT # ABS % MN
ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 143.6
105 22.6
94.1
109.3
40.4
5.7 63.5
99.5
2 150.4
110 24.6
97.6
107.8
41.8
5.2 64.4
99.5
LOCS
107 107 112 3 57 59 49 69 77
REPS
227 227 239 6 110 114 101 165 157
DIFF
6.8 5 2.0 3.5 1.5 1.4 0.5 0.9 0.0
PROB
000#
.000#
.000#
.121
.006#
.007#
.002#
.068*
.947
__________________________________________________________________________
DU GDU TST GRN STA STK RT BRT
VAR SHD SLK WTA APP GRN LDG LDG STK
DEPT # ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 1144
1166
55.1
6.1 5.1 91.4
87.2
100.0
2 1205
1202
54.6
5.7 6.5 88.3
89.4
100.0
LOCS
31 5 110 97 38 101 17 3
REPS
66 10 235 209 70 217 36 7
DIFF
61 36 0.5 0.4 1.4 3.2 2.2 0.0
PROB
.000#
.001#
.000#
.000#
.000#
.000#
.296
1.00
__________________________________________________________________________
* = 10% SIG
+ = 5% SIG
# = 1% SIG
In interpreting the foregoing color designations, reference may be had to
the Munsell Glossy Book of Color, a standard color reference.
PHG47 (PVP Certificate No. 8600131) is a Pioneer Hi-Bred International,
Inc. proprietary inbred.
Data for Items B, C, D, E, F, and G is based primarily on a maximum of four
reps from Johnston, Iowa grown in 1990 and 1991, plus description
information from the maintaining station.
ELECTROPHORESIS RESULTS
Isozyme Genotypes for PHTM9
Isozyme data were generated for inbred corn line PHTM9 according to the
procedures described in Stuber, C. W., Wendel, J. F., Goodman, M. M., and
Smith, J. S. C., "Techniques and Scoring Procedures for Starch Gel
Electrophoresis of Enzymes from Maize (Zea mays L.)" Technical Bulletin
No. 286, North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, North Carolina
State University, Raleigh, N.C. (1988).
The data in Table 2 compares PHTM9 with its parents, PHG47 and PHG36.
TABLE 2
______________________________________
ELECTROPHORESIS RESULTS FOR PHTM9
AND ITS PARENTS PHG47 AND PHG36
PARENTS
LOCI PHTM9 PHG47 PHG36
______________________________________
ACP1 4 4 4
ADH1 4 4 4
CAT3 9 9 9
DIA1 8 8 8
GOT1 4 4 4
GOT2 4 4 4
GOT3 4 4 4
IDH1 4 4 4
IDH2 6 4 6
MDH1 6 6 6
MDH2 3.5 3 3.5
MDH3 16 16 16
MDH4 12 12 12
MDH5 12 12 12
MMM 4 4 4
PGM1 9 9 9
PGM2 4 4 8
PGD1 3.8 2 3.8
PGD2 5 5 5
PHI1 4 4 4
______________________________________
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
This invention also is directed to methods for producing a corn plant by
crossing a first parent corn plant with a second parent corn plant wherein
the first or second parent corn plant is an inbred corn plant from the
line PHTM9. Further, both first and second parent corn plants can come
from the inbred corn line PHTM9. Thus, any such methods using the inbred
corn line PHTM9 are part of this invention: selfing, backcrosses, hybrid
production, crosses to populations, and the like. All plants produced
using inbred corn line PHTM9 as a parent are within the scope of this
invention. Advantageously, the inbred corn line is used in crosses with
other, different, corn inbreds to produce first generation (F.sub.1) corn
hybrid seeds and plants with superior characteristics.
As used herein, the term plant includes plant cells, plant protoplasts,
plant cell tissue cultures from which corn plants can be regenerated,
plant calli, plant clumps, and plant cells that are intact in plants or
parts of plants, such as embryos, pollen, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs,
leaves, husks, stalks, roots, root tips, anthers, silk and the like.
Duncan, Williams, Zehr, and Widholm, Planta, (1985) 165:322-332 reflects
that 97% of the plants cultured which produced callus were capable of
plant regeneration. Subsequent experiments with both inbreds and hybrids
produced 91% regenerable callus which produced plants. In a further study
in 1988, Songstad, Duncan & Widholm in Plant Cell Reports (1988),
7:262-265 reports several media additions which enhance regenerability of
callus of two inbred lines. Other published reports also indicated that
"nontraditional" tissues are capable of producing somatic embryogenesis
and plant regeneration. K. P. Rao, et al., Maize Genetics Cooperation
Newsletter, 60:64-65 (1986), refers to somatic embryogenesis from glume
callus cultures and B. V. Conger, et al., Plant Cell Reports, 6:345-347
(1987) indicates somatic embryogenesis from the tissue cultures of maize
leaf segments. Thus, it is clear from the literature that the state of the
art is such that these methods of obtaining plants are, and were,
"conventional" in the sense that they are routinely used and have a very
high rate of success.
Tissue culture of corn is described in European Patent Application,
publication 160,390, incorporated herein by reference. Corn tissue culture
procedures are also described in Green and Rhodes, "Plant Regeneration in
Tissue Culture of Maize," Maize for Biological Research (Plant Molecular
Biology Association, Charlottsville, Va. 1982, at 367-372) and in Duncan,
et al., "The Production of Callus Capable of Plant Regeneration from
Immature Embryos of Numerous Zea Mays Genotypes," 165 Planta 322-332
(1985). Thus, another aspect of this invention is to provide cells which
upon growth and differentiation produce corn plants having the
physiological and morphological characteristics of the inbred line PHTM9.
Corn is used as human food, livestock feed, and as raw material in
industry. The food uses of corn, in addition to human consumption of corn
kernels, include both products of dry- and wet-milling industries. The
principal products of corn dry milling are grits, meal and flour. The corn
wet-milling industry can provide corn starch, corn syrups, and dextrose
for food use. Corn oil is recovered from corn germ, which is a by-product
of both dry- and wet-milling industries.
Corn, including both grain and non-grain portions of the plant, is also
used extensively as livestock feed, primarily for beef cattle, dairy
cattle, hogs, and poultry.
Industrial uses of corn are mainly from corn starch in the wet-milling
industry and corn flour in the dry-milling industry. The industrial
applications of corn starch and flour are based on functional properties,
such as viscosity, film formation, adhesive properties, and ability to
suspend particles. The corn starch and flour have application in the paper
and textile industries. Other industrial uses include applications in
adhesives, building materials, foundry binders, laundry starches,
explosives, oil-well muds, and other mining applications.
Plant parts other than the grain of corn are also used in industry. Stalks
and husks are made into paper and wallboard and cobs are used for fuel and
to make charcoal.
The seed of inbred corn line PHTM9, the plant produced from the inbred
seed, the hybrid corn plant produced from the crossing of the inbred,
hybrid seed, and various parts of the hybrid corn plant can be utilized
for human food, livestock feed, and as a raw material in industry.
EXAMPLE 3
INBRED AND HYBRID PERFORMANCE OF PHTM9
In the examples that follow, the traits and characteristics of inbred corn
line PHTM9 are given as a line and in hybrid combination. The data
collected on inbred corn line PHTM9 is presented for the key
characteristics and traits.
The results in Table 3A compare PHTM9 to its PHG47 parent. The results show
PHTM9 has higher yield and test weight, but lower grain harvest moisture
compared to PHG47. PHTM9 is a taller inbred with higher ear placement and
flowers (GDU Shed and GDU Silk) earlier than PHG47. PHTM9 has better
seedling vigor and higher early stand count than PHG47. PHTM9 has a lower
pollen weight and smaller tassel compared to PHG47. PHTM9 has slightly
better stalk lodging resistance, but is more susceptible to root lodging
than PHG47. PHTM9 is more susceptible to common rust and Northern leaf
blight, but has better resistance to ear mold, head smut, and first and
second brood European corn borer.
Table 3B compares PHTM9 to its other parent, PHG36. PHTM9 has higher yield
and test weight, but lower grain harvest moisture than PHG36. PHTM9 is
taller with higher ear placement and flowers (GDU Shed and GDU Silk) later
than PHG36. PHTM9 and PHG36 have similar stalk lodging resistance, but
PHTM9 has slightly better root lodging resistance. PHTM9 is more
susceptible to second brood European corn borer than PHG36.
The results in Table 4A compare PHTM9 to PHG47 crossed to the same inbred
testers. The PHTM9 hybrids have lower yield and grain harvest moisture and
similar test weight compared to the PHG47 hybrids. The PHTM9 hybrids are
taller with higher ear placement than the PHG47 hybrids. The PHTM9 hybrids
have poorer stay green than the PHG47 hybrids.
Table 5 compares a PHTM9 hybrid to Pioneer Brand Hybrid 3751. 3751 has a
parent in common with the PHTM9 hybrid other than PHTM9. The hybrid is
adapted to much of the same area as the PHTM9 hybrid. The results show the
PHTM9 hybrid has lower yield and grain harvest moisture, but higher test
weight compared to 3751. The PHTM9 hybrid is taller with lower ear
placement and flowers (GDU Shed and GDU Silk) earlier than 3751. The PHTM9
hybrid has better grain appearance and stalk lodging resistance, but is
more susceptible to root lodging compared to 3751.
TABLE 3A
__________________________________________________________________________
PAIRED INBRED COMPARISON DATA
VARIETY #1 = PHTM9
VARIETY #2 = PHG47
__________________________________________________________________________
BU BU YLD EAR BAR PLT EAR SDG
VAR ACR ACR SC MST SZ PLT HT HT VGR
DEPT # ABS % MN
ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 44.1
73 4.6 15.6
4.0 88.4
77.9
22.9
6.7
2 39.9
66 3.7 18.2
3.3 88.6
62.5
17.9
4.5
LOCS
3 3 7 3 6 7 17 16 22
REPS
12 12 7 12 6 15 29 29 27
DIFF
4.2 7 0.9 2.6 0.7 0.3 15.4
5.1 2.2
PROB
.390
.338
.078*
.034+
.175
.953
.000#
.000#
.000#
__________________________________________________________________________
EST TIL GDU GDU POL POL POL TAS TAS
VAR CNT LER SHD SLK WT WT SC BLS SZ
DEPT # ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS % MN
ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 36.5
0.9 1232
1267
143.2
116 5.4 9.0 4.6
2 33.2
2.1 1336
1356
166.8
132 5.6 9.0 5.8
LOCS
48 26 38 37 8 8 14 4 11
REPS
115 42 59 57 16 16 24 8 11
DIFF
3.4 1.2 104 89 23.6
16 0.3 0.0 1.2
PROB
.000#
.113
.000#
.000#
.163
.221
.405
1.00
.019+
__________________________________________________________________________
TEX TST SCT STA STK
VAR EAR WT GRN GRN LDG
DEPT # ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 7.1 60.6
7.7 1.2 99.4
2 6.1 58.0
7.4 4.1 97.0
LOCS
7 3 9 5 2
REPS
7 12 9 11 8
DIFF
1.0 2.6 0.2 2.9 2.5
PROB
.156
.016+
594 .029+
.306
__________________________________________________________________________
RT COM EAR HD NLF
VAR LDG RST MLD SMT BLT
DEPT # ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 97.4
5.5 7.1 100.0
1.0
2 98.8
6.5 6.6 98.6
3.8
LOCS
6 2 10 4 4
REPS
10 2 10 8 4
DIFF
1.4 1.0 0.5 1.4 2.8
PROB
.363
.000#
.213
.391
.089*
__________________________________________________________________________
ECB ECB
VAR 1LF 2SC
DEPT # ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 4.4 4.3
2 3.2 3.8
LOCS
12 3
REPS
12 6
DIFF
1.3 0.5
PROB
.049+
.580
__________________________________________________________________________
* = 10% SIG
+ = 5% SIG
# = 1% SIG
TABLE 3B
__________________________________________________________________________
PAIRED INBRED COMPARISON DATA
VARIETY #1 = PHTM9
VARIETY #2 = PHG36
__________________________________________________________________________
BU BU BAR PLT EAR SDG EST TIL GDU GDU
VAR ACR ACR MST PLT HT HT VGR CNT LER SHD SLK
DEPT # ABS % MN
ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 33.5
65 15.3
75.9
79.0
23.8
6.0 47.7
0.4 1320
1330
2 21.2
41 16.5
55.2
57.0
17.5
6.7 50.8
0.8 1160
1170
LOCS
2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1
REPS
4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 2 2
DIFF
12.2
24 1.2 20.7
22.0
6.3 0.7 3.2 0.4 160 160
PROB
.186
.064*
.220
.594
.142
.344
.184
.185
.748
__________________________________________________________________________
TST STA STK
VAR WT GRN LDG
DEPT # ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 60.3
1.0 99.4
2 51.1
1.0 98.8
LOCS
2 3 2
REPS
4 6 4
DIFF
9.2 0.0 0.6
PROB
.328
1.00
.790
__________________________________________________________________________
RT
VAR LDG
DEPT # ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 92.1
2 87.8
LOCS
2
REPS
4
DIFF
4.3
PROB
.500
__________________________________________________________________________
ECB
VAR 2SC
DEPT # ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 6.0
2 8.5
LOCS
1
REPS
2
DIFF
2.5
PROB
__________________________________________________________________________
* = 10% SIG
+ = 5% SIG
# = 1% SIG
TABLE 4A
__________________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE INBRED BY TESTER PERFORMANCE COMPARING PHTM9 TO PHG47 CROSSED TO
THE SAME INBRED TESTERS AND GROWN IN THE SAME EXPERIMENTS. ALL VALUES
ARE
EXPRESSED AS PERCENT OF THE EXPERIMENT MEAN EXCEPT PREDICTED RM,
SELECTION
INDEX, AND YIELD (BU/ACR).
__________________________________________________________________________
SEL BU GDU PRM STK RT STA
INBRED
PRM IND ACR YLD MST SHD SHD LDG LDG GRN
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL REPLIC.
72 70 70 70 72 29 7 66 2 27
MEAN WTS
PHTM9 88 99 154 98 94 99 92 100 108 69
MEAN WTS
PHG47 92 104 161 103 100 102 95 99 108 121
DIFF. 4 5 7 5 6 3 3 1 53
__________________________________________________________________________
TST GRN SDG EST STK PLT EAR DRP BRT
INBRED
WTA APP VGR CNT CNT HT HT EAR STK
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL REPLIC.
68 58 32 57 75 42 42 43 2
MEAN WTS
PHTM9 100 110 94 99 100 107 101 100 102
MEAN WTS
PHG47 98 108 98 101 101 103 99 100 102
DIFF. 2 2 4 2 1 3 2 0
__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 5
__________________________________________________________________________
PHTM9 HYBRID COMPARED TO PIONEER HYBRID 3751
VARIETY #1 = PHTM9 HYBRID
VARIETY #2 = 3751
__________________________________________________________________________
BU BU BAR PLT EAR SDG EST DRP
BAR ACR ACR MST PLT HT HT VGR CNT EAR
DEPT # ABS % MN
ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 143.6
105 22.6
94.1
109.3
40.4
5.7 63.5
99.5
2 150.4
110 24.6
97.6
107.8
41.8
5.2 64.4
99.5
LOCS
107 107 112 3 57 59 49 69 77
REPS
227 227 239 6 110 114 101 165 157
DIFF
6.8 5 2.0 3.5 1.5 1.4 0.5 0.9 0.0
PROB
000#
.000#
.000#
.121
.006#
.007#
.002#
.068*
.947
__________________________________________________________________________
DU GDU TST GRN STA STK RT BRT
VAR SHD SLK WTA APP GRN LDG LDG STK
DEPT # ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS ABS
__________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL SUM
1 1144
1166
55.1
6.1 5.1 91.4
87.2
100.0
2 1205
1202
54.6
5.7 6.5 88.3
89.4
100.0
LOCS
31 5 110 97 38 101 17 3
REPS
66 10 235 209 70 217 36 7
DIFF
61 36 0.5 0.4 1.4 3.2 2.2 0.0
PROB
.000#
.001#
.000#
.000#
.000#
.000#
.296
1.00
__________________________________________________________________________
* = 10% SIG
+ = 5% SIG
# = 1% SIG
Deposits
Applicant has made available to the public without restriction a deposit of
at least 2500 seeds of inbred PHTM9 with the American Type Culture
Collection (ATCC), Rockville, Md. 20852 USA, ATCC Deposit No. 75749 on
Apr. 21, 1994 . The seeds deposited with the ATCC are taken from the same
deposit maintained by Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., 700 Capital
Square, 400 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309 since prior to the
filing date of this application. This deposit of the Inbred Corn Line
PHTM9 will be maintained without restriction in the ATCC depository, which
is a public depository, for a period of 30 years, or 5 years after the
most recent request, or for the effective life of the patent, whichever is
longer, and will be replaced if it becomes nonviable during that period.
Top